Reforming Stamp Duty: Policy Options to Help First Home Buyers

Why Stamp Duty Reform Matters

For first home buyers, stamp duty is not just another tax — it’s often the final barrier that tips them from “almost there” to “locked out.” While governments occasionally offer concessions, these are patchy, capped, and often fail to keep pace with rising property values. True reform requires structural changes that go beyond short-term relief.

Current Approaches in Australia

• NSW Property Tax Option: New South Wales trialled an annual property tax in place of stamp duty for eligible first home buyers. Instead of paying $30,000+ upfront, buyers could pay around $400–$1,500 annually, depending on property value. This eased entry but had limited take-up and was scrapped by the incoming government in 2023.

• ACT’s Transition: The Australian Capital Territory is phasing out stamp duty altogether, replacing it with a broad-based land tax over 20 years. This spreads the cost across ownership rather than concentrating it at purchase, making it easier for first-timers.

• State-Based Concessions: Other states provide partial exemptions or discounts, but only below certain thresholds (e.g., $600,000 in Victoria, $700,000 in Queensland). With median house prices in Sydney above $1.1 million and Melbourne around $930,000, many properties fall outside these limits.

Reform Options on the Table

1. Permanent Replacement with Annual Land Tax

   • Spreads costs evenly across ownership.

   • Reduces upfront savings burden.

   • Encourages mobility by removing heavy transaction costs.

   • Drawback: politically difficult, as existing homeowners may resist ongoing taxes.

2. Raising or Indexing Concession Thresholds

   • States could lift stamp duty exemptions to better match median house prices.

   • Indexing thresholds to property price growth would ensure concessions remain relevant over time.

3. Targeted First Home Buyer Relief

   • Expand grants and exemptions to apply to a broader range of properties, including townhouses and apartments, not just entry-level stock.

   • Means-tested relief to ensure benefits go to genuine first-time, lower-income buyers rather than investors.

4. Shared Equity + Stamp Duty Waiver

   • Governments could combine shared equity schemes with stamp duty waivers.

   • Example: Victoria’s Homebuyer Fund allows government to take an equity stake; pairing this with no upfront stamp duty could dramatically cut entry costs.

5. National Approach

   • Right now, every state runs its own concessions scheme. A coordinated national framework could reduce complexity and ensure young Australians in different states aren’t treated unequally.

The Broader Impact

Stamp duty reform wouldn’t just help first home buyers — it would make the housing market more dynamic. Lower transaction costs encourage downsizing, better housing matches, and less distortion in supply and demand. Over time, this could ease pressure across the entire housing system.

Stamp duty charges are a huge revenue earner for State and Territory Governments because they are unavoidable charges based on the value of the transaction being taxed. Instead of a fixed fee for every property buyer, there is a sliding scale. If you buy an expensive home, the governments will take more of your money. The taxes are not based on a service but they are an impost.

The situation is similar to stamp duties on the purchase of new or used cars. The greater the value of the vehicle, the greater the amount that the government wants.

There needs to be a discussion on the fairness of stamp duty taxes. 

• Next